View full size ↗The everyday problem
An order taken correctly on the floor still needs to arrive at the intended kitchen destination. Test the actual handoff through the configured KOT or kitchen-display workflow, with the people who will use it during service.
A workable process
Enter a small sample containing items handled by different parts of the kitchen if your setup supports that routing. Compare the received item, quantity and table reference with the order. Confirm how staff recognise a new ticket and distinguish it from an existing one.
A practical example
A waiter can see two portions on the ordering screen while the kitchen looks at an older ticket containing one. The team needs a shared way to identify the current request, especially after additions or changes.
Before you finish
Ask for a demonstration of amendments and device interruptions. Define who responds when a ticket does not appear, and check the existing order before sending another identical request to the kitchen.
Try this check with your team
Send a test order to the intended kitchen destination, then add one item after the first send. Have the kitchen identify the table, quantities and new instruction. Include a controlled resend so the team understands how to avoid preparing the same order twice.
What the result tells you
The handoff is reliable when the kitchen can interpret it without calling the counter for routine clarification. If the destination is wrong, review routing; if the content is unclear, review menu naming and the supported ticket layout.
See this workflow in Speed Plus.
Bring a sample transaction and your questions to a product demo.
Book a free demo ↗